Thanks for the reply!!!
For a possible error please see "von Mises stress is not the absolute value of von Mises stres (signed)" on "Code_Aster usage", but since that post I have a simpler test.
I created a square beam 30mm x 30mm x 90mm in OnShape {1} and imported it into SimScale {2} where I meshed it and ran a simulation with the material being aluminium, one end of the beam fixed and the other having a -1000N load on the Z axis.
I then downloaded the results of the simulation to my computer and used Paraview to view the results. The graphic results look quite reasonable, but if I look at the spreadsheet view of the data, filtering out all but "von Mises stress" and "von Mises stress (signed)" to make it easier to view, you see that the point[15].VMIS = 2.21281e+06 and point[15].VMIS_SG = 315597:
vtkOriginalIndices,Points,Points,Points,__vtkIsSelected__,von Mises stress,von Mises stress (signed)
0,0,-0.015,-0.015,0,1.92423e+07,-1.92423e+07
1,0,0.015,-0.015,0,1.96056e+07,-1.96056e+07
2,0.09,0.015,-0.015,0,1.30009e+06,1.30009e+06
3,0.09,-0.015,-0.015,0,1.22461e+06,1.22461e+06
4,0.09,0.015,0.015,0,1.34788e+06,1.34788e+06
5,0.09,-0.015,0.015,0,1.28705e+06,1.28705e+06
6,0,0.015,0.015,0,2.06716e+07,2.06716e+07
7,0,-0.015,0.015,0,2.17607e+07,2.17607e+07
8,0,-0.015,0.013125,0,1.72486e+07,1.72486e+07
9,0,-0.015,0.01125,0,1.46712e+07,1.46712e+07
10,0,-0.015,0.009375,0,1.17931e+07,1.17931e+07
11,0,-0.015,0.0075,0,8.36993e+06,8.36993e+06
12,0,-0.015,0.005625,0,6.77667e+06,6.77667e+06
13,0,-0.015,0.00375,0,5.32268e+06,5.32268e+06
14,0,-0.015,0.001875,0,3.1453e+06,3.1453e+06
15,0,-0.015,-9.71445e-17,1,2.21281e+06,315597
I'm a total noobie so I've very likely done something stupid, in anycase let me know if there is anything else I can do.
Links, remove the space after "https " and copy/paste into browser:
{1}: https ://cad.onshape.com/documents/6630a295f0826388c6d4790f/w/d439940fdf48e2bbadbd2f51/e/e5f086039571a74a7d520668
{2}: https ://www.simscale.com/workbench?publiclink=3c265235-c284-4747-93ec-71392324eb15